Media Bias generally targets against men.

Television Sitcoms represent one example of media bias.
But, that's just the tip of the iceberg.

There are several thousand magazines.
Each should be considered very offensive & unfair.
But, it certainly doesn't stop there.


(This forum could also include any literature, commercials,
advertisements, animated satire, magazines, radio broadcasts, or
anything).



1 "The Wonder Years"

"The Wonder Years" was one of countless T.V. shows which focused upon
the 'late 1960's".
So, needless to say, there was a great deal of anti-male sentiment.

Here's just one example:
The Teen Male and Female were both taking an scholastic examination.
And, needless to say, the outcome was quite predictable.
As usual, the girl performed vastly better than the boy.

Then, naturally,
the boy was portrayed as behaving immature because she was 'so much
smarter' than he.

And, please remember,
these programs are scripted in this calculating manner.

Why didn't this T.V. Program depict HIM outscoring her,
to which, SHE WOULD START ACTING CHILDISH?
This is just one example of 'The Wonder Years" targeting against men.

But, there are several more examples, as well.
------------


2 "All In The Family"

If we could name the most biased television program ever,
that vote would probably go to "All in The Family".

Perhaps, it's not the worst example,
but it did teach a precedent which many others have followed.

Anytime you watch that show,
it's almost as if,
they're manipulating the viewer to treat men in the same-exact abusive
manner.
PLUS,
they were encouraging every other Sitcom [writer/director/producer] to
create similar programming.

Maybe,
my dislike for "All in the family" derives from the simple message:

Everytime the audience jeered men,
he had somehow brought this suffering upon himself.
So,
the script writers would always depict the husband acting like a total
"Pig".
therefore,
it warranted the same level of abuse against him.

This program was especially disturbing for an 8-year old.
That's when I began watching "All in The Family".

Here's just one example:
There was an episode, to which,
the women were Pulling-on the Men's chest hairs,
until he begged for mercy.
This was truly sickening.
----------


3 "Even the Best Programs have been Tarnished"

Most favorite T.V. Shows have been tarnished by Women's Groups,
to some degree.

For example:
an episode of "The Rockford Files",
which was totally devoted toward Feminst Seminars.
And,
the entire script centered around an Author who was promoting her book.
This episode seemed rather odd to me.

On Quincy M.E.,
they had an episode devoted toward WOmen's Health Issues.

And they basically said that Male Doctors don't really have a place in
determining these matters.
"It's something only another woman could understand".
THey also described the act of "child bearing" as a gift which God has
given to women.
But of course,
other programs claim that women are burdened with these responsibilities.

Magnum P.I. had a few episodes devoted specifically toward "Woman's
Lib", and all that Jazz.

So, as you can see, this propaganda has even tarnished the best programs.


----------



4 "Remington Steel"
Do you remember the T.V. Program, "Remington Steele".

The entire program was about a Smart female detective who needed to
create a fictitious Male "alter ego".
But then, a Real man walked into her life.
And he assumed that identity.
And, of course, she solved all the mysteries,
while "Remington Steele" got all the credit.

Okay, it's not terribly offensive.

But, it's still alittle strange for T.V. to fuse extremism into their
scripts.
And, regardless,

....it's still a form of bias, nonetheless.


------------




5 "Consumer Documentary"

There was a documentary on the learning channel entitled "It's A Mall
World".
And, the obvious topic was the impact of Shopping Malls.
The effect is has on consumers, and society in general.
But, for no apparent reason,
they began speaking about "Woman's Lib".
This, of course,
was completely unrelated to the topic of the documentary.

The reason for this, is because,
the writer was an active member of a Woman's group.

So, needless to say,
we can expect this type of unprofessional commentary.

It's really quite simple:
If you hire a feminist,
they're likely to abuse their profession.
----------



6 "Marketing the Teen audience"


It's not surprising to find extremism throughout the industry.

This includes programming which targets the teenage audience.

For years, networks, such as MTV and VH1,
have found ways to push feminism upon the masses.

For example:
the television program "My Generation" was supposed to play music from
the 1960's.
But instead,
they would often display demoralizing images of "Woman Power".
This became part of their daily routine.
And, when another program was created playing music from the 1970's,
they followed the usual routine.
It was called "8-Track Flashback".
And, once again,
they chose to mix Feminist dogma along with classic music.

Needless to say,
when there are programs celebrating 1980's music,
they also find ways to harass us with Feminized imagery.
And, into the 21st century,
the writers for MTV and VH1 are always seeking ways to misuse their
profession.

And, as a result,
we constantly find this type of inappropriate material.

So, at one time, you could turn on the "Music" network on any given
day, and face non-stop harassment from Women's Groups.
----------




7 "SBTB: A Ppogram for the Younger Audience"

There are many examples of Feminized programming,
which targets the younger audience.

But, an all-time example was the sit-com entitled
"Saved By The Bell".

It featured kids in school.
And, on each and every episode,
the males were often called "macho Pigs".

In retrospect, the writers probably thought there was more humor than
anything else.
However, at the time, this proved to be quite devastating.

There was no reason to center the entire episodes around Extremist
ideology.
----------


8 "Primate Documentaries"

Upon watching the "Nature & Wildlife" programs for several years,
there's an enormous amount of 'Feminized' influence.

Yet, it's often done for varying reasons.
For example:
one day,
they talk about the "dominant male" chimpanzee.
Then,
another episode talks about "maternal bond" amongst females.

A few episodes have described female apes as "repressed mothers".
While other documentaries claim that mothers actually rule all primate
societies.
But,
after all is said and done,
they revert to their original story.

There's an ulterior motive behind it all.
.....After reshaping the initial story to the "male dominance"
conclusion,
they also produced a well documented episode regarding the "Bonobo
Chimpanzee".
In which case,
the females supposedly have control.
Then,
the documentary claimed it was merely egalitarian.
So,
one minute, the Bonobo community was matriarchal,
then, it was simply fair.

Now, through it all,
it's interesting how anthropologists are fixed upon this narrow idea.

Also, what gives them the right to draw such conclusions,
based solely upon using their own logic?

All the while, contradictions surmount:
During one study of Chimpanzees,
they determined that males are physically interested in females,
while she doesn't share mutual feelings.
Then, they told another story of bonding friendship between females in
the community.
Along with their children.
Then,
they spoke of male privilege in the Chimpanzee community,
and so on, and so forth.
Etc. etc.
(It shows just how ridiculous the media can be).

Now,
it wasn't until Three decades later, when,
we finally learned that most primate research was performed
exclusively by females.

It was believed that,
women would possess a sensitive aspect which men are incapable.

When in reality,
all they brought was unprofessional ethics.
Along with Feminized propaganda.

But,
it just goes to show how much privilege women yield,
throughout society.

In conclusion:

Surely,
you've NEVER pondered this particular issue until now.
But,
it stands to prove how much has been tarnished by the Feminists.
Clustering documentaries with this level of propaganda.

And there are a million examples, similar to this.
----------


9 "Women's Talk-Shows from the 1980's"


Try to imagine this:

A distinct type of programming,
geared exclusively to suit the woman's interest.
It truly brought television to an unimaginable low.

Firstly,
you must realize the distinction between Today's Talk shows,
From those during the 1970's thru mid-1990's.

Back then,
their sole purpose was to spread Extremist dogma.

And,
although "Women's Talk-shows" remain bias into the 21st century,
they no longer carry the same direct affiliations with Woman's Groups.


During the early 1980's,
The daytime talk-shows totally focused upon women,
for any reason imaginable.

It was a pure line up,
consisting of routine insults against men.
While also promoting `Woman Power', and `Female togetherness'.

It's truly difficult to comprehend how bad the problem was.

Basically,
Feminists Owned the entire daytime talk-shows from 9 AM until 4 P.M.
And,
only if you were lucky enough to arrive home afterward,
Could you be spared from this onslaught.

Please understand:
Woman's Talk shows, particularly from the 1980's,
Were an incomprehensible travesty of journalism.

Each day, they found new reason to glorify womanhood.
While launching verbal assaults against men.

And, this comprised the entire Daytime scene for several decades.

Finally, in the late 1990's,
Women's talk shows introduced a more universal purpose.

And, although, these programs still favored women,
Never again would the media experience such absolute monotony.

----------

10 "The Morning News"

It difficult to pin-point the exact year
But, somewhere along the line,
the morning News programs became less professional.
and, less newsworthy.
Beginning c.1990, they literally began to resemble Women's Talk-shows.

Now, although there was already a great deal of bias,
that's an entirely separate issue.

Instead, these entire programs became little more than another Woman's
talk show.
Perhaps, alot more fancy & landscaped in a professional environment.
But, the content was highly feminized.

Here's just one example:
The NBC Today show began addressing so-called "Women's issues" several
times each week.

And, sadly, it became part of their routine curriculum.
It became top priority to direct their efforts toward women.

Please bear to mind:
this had nothing to do with any particular issue.

And, as a result, it became painful to watch these morning News Programs.
So, within a few years time,
the most reputable programs were nearly dissolved.
It became a mixture of valid news, and feminized stories.

What authorized the main networks to primarily target the female
audience?
There were already dozens of established Women's Talk Shows.
Yet, this mentality expanded into the Morning News arena.
----------

11 "Repetitive Campaigns"

Aside from any singular episode, incident, or program series:

There are also frequent "image campaigns" for a common theme.

SO, for example:

there are times when the entire media is fixed upon the same precise idea.

Perhaps, they're showing concern for the 'self esteem' of every girl.

Or there's a universal claim that our health care system is biased
against women.

One time, the entire media focused upon the issue of "women in
athletics".
and, there was another time when "Girls in Mathematics class" became a
wide-scale issue.

The most ridiculous example was their intervention into the dating
arena.
And, the entire media unilaterally stated that,
"women are angry because of "unwanted" advances by men.
This dogma was given such great attention,
that, it literally replaced every scheduled program on all networks.

In other words: for several weeks,
virtually all programs throughout television were pre-emptied.

It truly indicates just how far Journalists are willing to go,
in their support of Lobbying groups.

But, these are just a few examples....
----------

12 "Talk-Shows"
For decades,
the single most-evident example of bias was the Day-time talk-show.

This went far beyond an issue of mere bias.
Instead,
Each program provoked a totally-Gynocentric environment.

In the 21st century,
most talk-shows are still bias.

It's already been mentioned on this forum.

Usually, there are less debates than previous decades.
However, should an conflict occur,
Every male guest would be at a major disadvantage.

There's also a less-severe issue,
which proposes little offense.
But,
even the most mild programs appeal strictly toward her interests.
And, if the situation was reversed,
extremists would raise a fuss, nonetheless...
----------

13 "VH1 Divas"
Everyone became familiar with the "Diva" theme.

Even if you've never watched VH1, it resonated throughout the media.

But few people remember:
this was just one, in a series of campaigns from VH1.

Aside from the usual programming,
there was the "celebration of women in music".
"Lilith Fair" was one such example.
There are many additional...

But, a decade before that,
VH1 had launched a major crusade promoting gynecocracy.
It referred to woman as, "THE BETTER HALF",
and it looked similar to the Diva's series a decade later.

But, needless to say, The latter claimed .....
....that such encouragement for women hadn't taken place, before.

Plus, it was distinctly a Celebration of the female persona.
And, more than words of encouragement.


It all leads to wonder:
If the writers of VH1 (etc.) persist in such activity,
why isn't this criticized by the administrators of that network?

Good or bad, right or wrong,
this "Diva" stuff is clearly off-topic.
and, it has little to do with the musical profession.

 

Presented by Men's Rights Movement.

also on www.Mensrights.cc